Pittsfield Tax Rates Down But Values Mean Increased Bills

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The city's tax rates have gone down but rising property values will increase most bills.  

On Tuesday, the City Council approved a residential tax rate of $17.94 per $1,000 of valuation and a commercial, industrial, and personal property tax rate of $37.96 per $1,000 of valuation.

The fiscal year 2025 rate is 51 cents lower than the previous year but the average tax bill for a single-family home valued at $295,291 will increase by $354.51 annually. Last year, the same home was worth $267,914.

Of the 11,328 single-family homes, 568 will see a decrease, 1,687 will see an increase of less than $100, and 3,777 will see an increase less than the average.

"As you can see, most of our assessed values are up," Chief Assessor Laura Catalano said.

While a couple of councilors expressed concerns, the motion passed unanimously.

"As I said before, this is always the worst meeting for me," Councilor at Large Kathy Amuso said.

At the beginning of the term in January, she submitted a petition asking for a budget that is as close to level-funded as possible. She said the city collaboratively worked hard to get close to that goal and going forward, they should do the same.

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren said the new administration has been responsive to ideas and concerns in developing this metric.

"Politics, I have found, is a give and take situation and since I don't think I can take some of the things that [Mayor Peter Marchetti's] done for us and not give so this year, I will be supporting this tax rate but I concur with Councilor Amuso that we have to still focus, really focus," he said.


"Because I'm going to tell you next year, it's going to be worse, I think, on a national level. I think we're going to be seeing federal funds dry up. I think the economy is not going to be as good so we're going to find ourselves behind an eight ball that we may not have seen for years."

The levy limit for FY25 is $114,615,097 and $1,872,514 in new growth is expected.  With a levy limit of 114,615,097, the city has $294,085.80 in excess levy capacity, more than $531,000 less than the year prior.

The city hit its levy ceiling in fiscal year 2016 through 2021.

Finance Director Matthew Kerwood said that even when the levy ceiling was met in prior years, there was an excess levy capacity. He finds this a "bit concerning."

"Given the constraints, we really did need to budget in a different way, more conservatively, just given the constraints that we were under so we were able to create that excess level capacity," he said.

"But this is again, the lowest it has been in, since I've been here."

Kerwood said one of the fundamental things that needs to be considered in the next budget session is generating new growth.

"It's really new growth that plays a key factor in being able to expand that levy," he said.

Earlier in the meeting, the council supported a second two-year extension of a tax increment financing agreement with Somnath LLC, initially approved in 2021. The Desai family, who are well established in the local sector, plan to build a Holiday Inn Express at 1055 South St.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip said the $13 million hotel is a perfect example of new growth.


Tags: fiscal 2025,   property taxes,   tax classification,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Picks Information Panel for Public Safety Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town has a public safety building proposal to present to taxpayers, and now, an informational committee will help move the process forward.

On Monday, the Select Board voted to form a public safety building informational outreach committee and re-appointed four members: Dean Clement, Daniel MacWhinnie, Mark Siegars, and Lisa Dachinger.

"The Public Safety Building Committee has done their job. Now we need, hopefully with some of those same bodies, to form a new committee of some type and move forward," Select Board member Timothy Sorrell explained.

Earlier this month, the town officials voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility to town meeting, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build.  The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

"There is the option to go to what could be a debt exclusion, which requires a two-thirds majority at either a special town meeting or an annual town meeting, and that can be followed by inclusion in a ballot," Town Administrator Gina Dario said.

Siegars advised that if the question goes to a ballot first with a fixed project budget, that amount can't be changed for a subsequent special town meeting vote.

"In our discussions, there are committee members who are willing to stay on if you wanted to continue the committee or appoint to new one, who have volunteered to be involved with any public information sessions to try to answer the questions with the idea that that they would also explore further and work with Gina and town counsel on specifically what the question should be for a special town meeting, and if, if warranted a subsequent ballot vote," he reported.

Chairman Michael Murphy echoed the former committees' arguments that the town can't explore grants and financing until it has approved an amount.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories