Dalton Green Committee Selects Greenhouse Gas Inventory Platform

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Green Committee has voted to use the Metropolitan Area Planning Council Greenhouse Gas Inventory Platform. 
 
At its August meeting, the board was presented with three options: ClearPath, an MAPC model, and an in-house Excel model. 
 
After reviewing each platform, the committee selected the MAPC model because of its consistency and comparability with the state, user-friendliness, and sources included.
 
The platform is completely free and was built by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council in Massachusetts, said Cisco Tomasino, BlueStrike climate and events manager.
 
Since it was built in Massachusetts for Massachusetts, it is the most popular model used by many towns in the state, he said. 
 
Committee Chair David Wasielewski said MAPC is his initial preference as it will allow the town to compare its data with other towns. 
 
The state can "more or less control that kind of information" and the town has to keep monitoring the, Wasielewski said. The committee unanimously agreed 
 
"I thought the MAPC was a user-friendly format, too. I had no problem understanding it," Committee member Laurie Martinelli added. 
 
The ClearPath platform is the most premium model that is used across the country by towns, cities, counties, but is also the only one of the options that cost money, at $1,200 per year, Tomasino said. 
 
It is an online platform and has nice graphics, he said. 
 
The final option would have been for BlueStrike's own in-house Excel model, which is internally developed and very customizable. 
 
In other news: 
 
The committee directed BlueStrike to provide ranking of the survey questions to shorten it and make it less complex. 
 
Committee members expressed concerns regarding the surveys length and wanted to narrow it down to encourage participation from residents. 
 
"This is the sort of survey where, in the commercial world, you would offer to pay people to take," committee member Todd Logan said. 
 
"This is not something people voluntarily take, or if they do, they do the first page, the second page, and then they lose interest." 
 
Tomasino from will rank the questions by importance, categorizing them as vital, helpful but not vital, or unimportant, and will follow up with the committee by Friday. 
 
The committee wants to have the survey done by its Oct. 13 education event, and plans to finalize the survey questions at their next meeting in 2 weeks
 
The committee also mentioned the possibility having the survey online to improve accessibility but were concerned with receiving spam from people from other areas. 
 
"Certainly, we could ask for a street address for a numerical representation. Obviously, that sort of brings up other sort of transparency issues." said Rich Swanson, Blue Strike Climate and Energy Director.
 
"[Tomasino] had an interesting idea, though, that we can also compare identical responses so that if, for example, we see 10 identical responses across all questions that would certainly raise a flag. We can talk about how to deal with outliers like that." 

Tags: green committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Picks Information Panel for Public Safety Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town has a public safety building proposal to present to taxpayers, and now, an informational committee will help move the process forward.

On Monday, the Select Board voted to form a public safety building informational outreach committee and re-appointed four members: Dean Clement, Daniel MacWhinnie, Mark Siegars, and Lisa Dachinger.

"The Public Safety Building Committee has done their job. Now we need, hopefully with some of those same bodies, to form a new committee of some type and move forward," Select Board member Timothy Sorrell explained.

Earlier this month, the town officials voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility to town meeting, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build.  The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

"There is the option to go to what could be a debt exclusion, which requires a two-thirds majority at either a special town meeting or an annual town meeting, and that can be followed by inclusion in a ballot," Town Administrator Gina Dario said.

Siegars advised that if the question goes to a ballot first with a fixed project budget, that amount can't be changed for a subsequent special town meeting vote.

"In our discussions, there are committee members who are willing to stay on if you wanted to continue the committee or appoint to new one, who have volunteered to be involved with any public information sessions to try to answer the questions with the idea that that they would also explore further and work with Gina and town counsel on specifically what the question should be for a special town meeting, and if, if warranted a subsequent ballot vote," he reported.

Chairman Michael Murphy echoed the former committees' arguments that the town can't explore grants and financing until it has approved an amount.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories