image description
The Traffic Commission wants a traffic study down for the Senior Center now that it will be the town's polling station. Commissioners say the limited parking lot and narrow street may cause safety concerns.

Dalton Traffic Commission Urges Need For Traffic Study

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Traffic Commission wrote a letter to the Select Board urging for a traffic study to ensure safe traffic control during elections now that the polling station is at the Senior Center. 
 
The concern was raised by Traffic Commission Chair William Drosehn during its meeting last week. 
 
Now that the decision has been made, the commission needs to weigh in and look into how to make the roads safer during elections, he said.  
 
The Select Board voted to relocate the polling station from the Community Recreation Association to the Senior Center in August, going against the ad hoc committee's suggestion.
 
The ad hoc committee was made up of the police chief, the fire chief, the highway superintendent, and Town Clerk Heather Hunt.
 
Limited parking at the Senior Center may cause parking overflow onto side streets, which could create a safety issue by blocking emergency personnel from accessing the area, Police Chief Deanna Strout said during the August meeting. 
 
The roads are also not designed to handle the amount of traffic elections would bring, the Traffic Commission said during its meeting last week. 
 
"The streets are too narrow for the amount of traffic we're going to see," commissioner Al Nadeu said. 
 
Nadeu recommended that they write a letter to request the Select Board reverse this decision. This was shot down when it was noted that it is unlikely the board's minds will be changed and that the safety concerns need to be addressed before the next election. 
 
The commission wants to look at the area's traffic patterns. One of the major concerns is the blind spots on Glennon Avenue, including the hill "coming over the top" and the curb coming around the post office. People are going to turn into or come out of Glennon Avenue, Drosehn said. 
 
The commission needs to consider the best place to put signage, and the police details to make the area safe for residents. 
 
To inform these decisions the town should pay for an engineering company to conduct a traffic study, Drosehn said. 
 
"My thought being that the Finance Committee knows there's enough money in the engineering budget to maybe have an engineer, a traffic engineer of some kind, come in here and give us some healthy direction as to where to place signs and where to place traffic safety," Drosehn said.
 
"... We have money in the engineering budgets now it's not like we are broke … We also have engineering money in the stabilization account as well."
 
The town also has a special town meeting coming up so this could be added to the warrant, he said. 
 
For projects like this the town generally does not have to go out to bid and it's unlikely a traffic study would cost much, maybe $5,000, Drosehn said.
 
"If we can avoid one accident by doing it, I'm gonna be head over heels with that," he said. 
 
Drosehn is also the chair of the Finance Committee. 

Tags: traffic commission,   voting,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Picks Information Panel for Public Safety Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town has a public safety building proposal to present to taxpayers, and now, an informational committee will help move the process forward.

On Monday, the Select Board voted to form a public safety building informational outreach committee and re-appointed four members: Dean Clement, Daniel MacWhinnie, Mark Siegars, and Lisa Dachinger.

"The Public Safety Building Committee has done their job. Now we need, hopefully with some of those same bodies, to form a new committee of some type and move forward," Select Board member Timothy Sorrell explained.

Earlier this month, the town officials voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility to town meeting, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build.  The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

"There is the option to go to what could be a debt exclusion, which requires a two-thirds majority at either a special town meeting or an annual town meeting, and that can be followed by inclusion in a ballot," Town Administrator Gina Dario said.

Siegars advised that if the question goes to a ballot first with a fixed project budget, that amount can't be changed for a subsequent special town meeting vote.

"In our discussions, there are committee members who are willing to stay on if you wanted to continue the committee or appoint to new one, who have volunteered to be involved with any public information sessions to try to answer the questions with the idea that that they would also explore further and work with Gina and town counsel on specifically what the question should be for a special town meeting, and if, if warranted a subsequent ballot vote," he reported.

Chairman Michael Murphy echoed the former committees' arguments that the town can't explore grants and financing until it has approved an amount.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories