Massachusetts to Begin Distribution of Premium Payments to Low-Income Workers

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — Eligible low-income workers around the state should start seeing $500 checks in their mailboxes. 
 
Approximately 500,000 people will be begin receiving payments over the next week through the COVID-19 Essential Employee Premium Pay Program.
 
These payments were previously announced last month and represent the first round of a $460 million program passed by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Charlie Baker as part of a $4 billion spending plan for American Rescue Plan Act funds. Under this program created by the Legislature, the administration was provided flexibility to design the program and develop eligibility parameters to ensure this critical support is provided quickly to workers across the commonwealth.
 
Massachusetts residents will be eligible for first-round payments if, based on filed 2020 Massachusetts tax returns, their income from employment was at least $12,750 — the equivalent to working 20 hours a week for 50 weeks at minimum wage as of 2020 — and their total income put them below 300 percent of the federal poverty level.
 
The 2020 levels for households were $12,760 for one person; $17,240 for two; $21,720 for three, and $26,200 for four.
 
Individuals who received unemployment compensation in 2020 will not be eligible for the first round of payments, nor will commonwealth executive branch employees who received or will receive a one-time payment from the state as their employer. Eligible individuals will receive the payment in the form of a check mailed to them. Checks will be mailed in batches in the coming days.
 
Click here for more information on eligibility or call 1-866-750-9803 weekdays between 9 and 4. Some frequently asked questions can be found here.
 
The legislation creating the Premium Pay program included $500 million in total for low-income essential workers; this $460 million program comprises the majority of those funds, and $40 million was allocated to fund previous agreements with state employee unions. This first round of payments, worth $250 million, will be made based on 2020 returns. Following the 2021 tax filing season, the next round of payments will be made using information from 2021 returns.
 
Information on plans to disburse subsequent rounds of funds will be released in the future. 

Tags: COVID-19,   


More Coronavirus Updates

Keep up to date on the latest COVID-19 news:


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Vote No on Article 13 at Dalton Town Meeting

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

On May 5, the voters of the Town of Dalton will be asked to vote on 31 Articles at the annual Town Meeting. I encourage all voters attending to vote "No" on Article 13.

Article 13 reads:

"To see if Town will rescind the vote taken under Article 1 of the May 1,2017 Annual Town Meeting authorizing the demolition of the old Dalton High School and the sale of the property for the redevelopment for houses in accordance with the Zoning By-Laws of the Town at this site; or take any other action in relation thereto."
(TWO-THIRDS VOTE REQUIRED)

The town did demolish the old Dalton High School. However the site was never re-developed for building lots as voted for by the voters of Dalton.

To the voters who originally voted on May 1, 2017, annual town meeting your vote meant nothing, if it can be changed so easily. So, if voters vote for something at the upcoming town meeting, someone could petition for a special town meeting and rescind that voting result. Doesn't hardly seem right.

The intent of changing the original vote is to the use the site to erect a new ridiculous 13,000 square foot, ten million plus dollar police station. Which the Town doesn’t mention in the text of Article 13. There are more viable alternate plans for a new police station that would cost far less and make a lot more sense.

Why would the town build a police station in the middle of a residential area anyways? If I were a resident in the area I would be outraged.

Why would the town give up six building lots? How much money will the Town lose by not selling these lots, not to mention the tax revenue that could be collected. Doesn’t make much sense, does it? I don’t know why the Town has not developed the building lots like it was supposed to. It’s been eight years since the vote in 2017.

Keep in mind, regardless of what the site will be used for, the site will require millions of dollars to address the repair and upgrade of the Walker Brook culvert system that runs under the site. So, you can add that to the cost of a new police station.

Unfortunately, if you are eligible voter in the Town of Dalton and are not able or do not attend annual town meeting you will not be able to vote on this important article or any other article in the warrant. The town gets to pick your pocket and decide things that affect you without the your vote. This voter discrimination really needs to stop. After all this is the 21st century not the 18th. Of the 4,500 plus registered voters, the town meetings historically are attended by less the 200 voters. Two hundred voters is not 2/3 of 4,500 voters. Why should 200 voters be able to decide the fate of the other 4,300 voters?

I hope the voters attending the May 5 Dalton annual town meeting will vote a resounding "NO" on Article 13.

Bruce Lester
Dalton, Mass. 

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories