image description

'Planes, Trains and Automobiles': Conveys Friendship

By Michael S. GoldbergeriBerkshires Film Critic
Print Story | Email Story
I wish that I were reviewing one of the several movies about this pox upon our house that are certain to be made when the horror is deep into our rearview mirror. But until that glorious return to normality has us resuming all the simple joys of life we take for granted, like going to the movies, I'll be retro-reviewing and thereby sharing with you the films that I've come to treasure over the years, most of which can probably be retrieved from one of the movie streaming services. It is my fondest hope that I've barely put a dent into this trove when they let the likes of me back into the Bijou.
……………………………………………………………………………………………
 
Contemplating director John Hughes' "Planes, Trains and Automobiles," a touchingly hilarious paean to friendship, I mentally glanced back for a second to Charlie Rose' interview of legendary architect Philip Johnson, then about 92. Still vital, vibrant and deep in requested commissions, he regaled Rose of his "secret" to success, longevity and happiness. But while applauding Johnson for his joie de vie, Rose couldn't help but ask how the celebrated builder reconciled life with all his old friends now gone. Not skipping a beat, Johnson glibly responded, "Oh, you make new friends."
 
Geez, that's cold, I thought … such pragmatism about so rare and invaluable a sentiment. How many truly close friends does one accumulate in life? Playmates are one thing, but I'm talking soul mates.
 
I miss Bob. I could call him late at night and randomly throw out a shared memory. He'd laugh. I'd laugh. All of it saying, you're here, I'm here, we acknowledge each other's lives. That'd be enough. We hang up, smiles on our faces
 
Oh, sometimes I blurt a cherished phrase to a total stranger, Holden Caulfield style, just to keep it alive a little longer, perhaps hoping to see if it might conjure some spirit. And while I understand why Johnson preferred not to dwell on such things, I don't know if life would mean as much to me without this dab of respectful melancholia that says, "I knew you, and I remember you."
 
What Hughes so passionately delves amidst the slapstick, cacophony and nutty incongruity of two vastly diverse men tossed into screwball circumstances is that, while you rarely make new friends in adulthood, if you do it is a blessing. This is a preciously eccentric buddy-buddy/road movie to beat the band, the jaunty, farcical momentum sneakily cloaking the mushiness men are so famous for avoiding like the dickens.
 
Hughes comically epitomizes the aversion in a scene where Steve Martin's Neal Page, a big deal exec, and John Candy's Del Griffith, a traveling shower curtain ring salesman, must share a motel bed. Waking up in an awkwardly compromising configuration, both men, visibly abashed, jump from the mattress and beat their chests in a show of machismo, with Neal almost instinctively asking, "You see that Bears game last week?"
 
"Helluva game, helluva game," Del answers in his most masculine voice.
 
The film is a crash course in acquaintanceship as Neal and Del, who, by chance necessity team up in New York in an attempt to get home to Chicago in time for Thanksgiving, their alternately wild and philosophically telling experiences taking place across the array of title conveyances.
 
The estimable catalog of hilarious memories worthy of recounting to grandchildren -- you know, the sort of calamities that aren't so funny when they're happening -- are accrued in but two days.
 
Attesting that friendship may only be second to romantic love in the realm of enigmatic human emotions, auteur Hughes mines a meaningful thought or two about its root essence, reverently recognizing beneath the hijinks the sacrifice, generosity and tolerance to achieve the real deal.
 
While Del is for the most part a convivial, meat-and-potatoes guy, albeit overly loquacious to Neal's dismay, our more buttoned-down traveler is, to coin a phrase, the proverbial pickle whose high school yearbook picture might have written beneath it, "Least likely to make a new friend."
 
Many of his strident invectives concerning Del's habits and demeanor take us aback in their harshness. But here's where our moviegoing idealism kicks in.
 
People rarely change their spots. You meet up for lunch with a friend who years ago bored you to death with her long, self-serving bubba meises (Yiddish for inconsequential stories), thinking maybe things have changed. But, after about only 7 1/2 minutes, how wrong you were.
 
But the movies, aside from the avant-garde stuff and some of the darker genres, most often encourage faith. Misers can become philanthropists, idiots become smart, and yes, even that stultifying bore you dreaded having lunch with can become fascinating. The right script can cure just about any human failing. All of which isn't that naïve if you consider that most of civilization's accomplishments begin with a vision. In the best-case scenario, the cinema is a vicarious conduit, like literature, just waiting for humankind to catch up with its dreams.
 
Thus, as we giddily witness the constantly at odds quarrelers slapdashedly navigate practically every mode of travel between New York and Chicago, what our inner goodness revels in most is the hope-inspired flowering of a friendship.
 
"Planes, Trains and Automobiles," rated R, is a Paramount Pictures release directed by John Hughes and stars Steve Martin, John Candy and Laila Robins. Running time: 93 minutes

Tags: movie review,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Vote No on Article 13 at Dalton Town Meeting

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

On May 5, the voters of the Town of Dalton will be asked to vote on 31 Articles at the annual Town Meeting. I encourage all voters attending to vote "No" on Article 13.

Article 13 reads:

"To see if Town will rescind the vote taken under Article 1 of the May 1,2017 Annual Town Meeting authorizing the demolition of the old Dalton High School and the sale of the property for the redevelopment for houses in accordance with the Zoning By-Laws of the Town at this site; or take any other action in relation thereto."
(TWO-THIRDS VOTE REQUIRED)

The town did demolish the old Dalton High School. However the site was never re-developed for building lots as voted for by the voters of Dalton.

To the voters who originally voted on May 1, 2017, annual town meeting your vote meant nothing, if it can be changed so easily. So, if voters vote for something at the upcoming town meeting, someone could petition for a special town meeting and rescind that voting result. Doesn't hardly seem right.

The intent of changing the original vote is to the use the site to erect a new ridiculous 13,000 square foot, ten million plus dollar police station. Which the Town doesn’t mention in the text of Article 13. There are more viable alternate plans for a new police station that would cost far less and make a lot more sense.

Why would the town build a police station in the middle of a residential area anyways? If I were a resident in the area I would be outraged.

Why would the town give up six building lots? How much money will the Town lose by not selling these lots, not to mention the tax revenue that could be collected. Doesn’t make much sense, does it? I don’t know why the Town has not developed the building lots like it was supposed to. It’s been eight years since the vote in 2017.

Keep in mind, regardless of what the site will be used for, the site will require millions of dollars to address the repair and upgrade of the Walker Brook culvert system that runs under the site. So, you can add that to the cost of a new police station.

Unfortunately, if you are eligible voter in the Town of Dalton and are not able or do not attend annual town meeting you will not be able to vote on this important article or any other article in the warrant. The town gets to pick your pocket and decide things that affect you without the your vote. This voter discrimination really needs to stop. After all this is the 21st century not the 18th. Of the 4,500 plus registered voters, the town meetings historically are attended by less the 200 voters. Two hundred voters is not 2/3 of 4,500 voters. Why should 200 voters be able to decide the fate of the other 4,300 voters?

I hope the voters attending the May 5 Dalton annual town meeting will vote a resounding "NO" on Article 13.

Bruce Lester
Dalton, Mass. 

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories